Define montage editing plus#

Using the search option in GoogleBook to find the other mentions of decoupage.Īn over 300 page book – no index no mention of découpage.Tomáš Pospiszyl is a Czech critic and art historian who is head of the Department of Theory and History of Art at the Academy of Fine Arts in Prague. Anyone know what a timer is? Well, here you learn this job was to work out the total running time of a script. Though what there is of the rest of the chapter is fascinating stuff. Look on these annoying missing pages not as a reason to have to buy the book, more like the discovery of a pile of dusty out takes from which you are painstakingly reconstructing the mind of the long gone editor of some unnamed film.įor the beginner, the first paragraph can be quite sufficient to mull over.

Define montage editing plus#

As usual there are vital pages missing, but enough to get the general idea plus some.

The Classical Hollywood Cinema by David Bordwell, Janet Staiger, Kristin ThompsonĬhapter 6. This Screening the Past review of Valerie Orpen’s Fim editing: the art of the expressive, points out the not always obvious point: editing as cutting and joining. On the History of Film Style by David Bordwell Suppose if one knew how many frames per meter (we already know 24 fps), tout a fait. How meters of film convert to mins/secs, would be nice to know. He then goes on to mention logical decoupage. This is very useful because he gives an example of a decoupaged scene: a numbered list with meters of film to be used in each shot. Has three beginning pages of “The Decoupage” by Henri Diament-Berger from the “Le filmage” section of a book called Le Cinéma. “When I have finished writing the découpage, my film is made.”įrench Film Theory and Criticism By Richard Abel There are a few pages missing here and there, but the discussion on découpage runs on up to page 15, where there is a quote from Rene Clair: Frequently, mention is made of a prior “stage”, the idée de film, which might be an anecdote noted in a few lines or at most a few pages. There were five stages listed in script development “manuals”: the synopsis, the traitement, the continuité, the dialogues or continuité dialoguée, and the découpage techniqué. : Stages in development of script GoogleBook of Film Editing By Valerie Orpen, elucidates more and ties it in with editing. Jonathan Rosenbaum posts up his découpage entry for what he says was an aborted Oxford Companion to Film. 2) The practical breakdown of the film’s construction into separate shots/sequences prior to filming & 3) The underlying structure of the finished film, which has probably deviated from the original “decoupage.” Noel Burch, in Theory of Film Practice, defines the three terms for which decoupage is interchangeably used for as: 1) The final form of a script replete with the required technical information.

The French definition is “to cut,” but applied to film the word is better described as construction. The second term, decoupage, has no English equivalent. Editing implies the formal construction of the film from one shot to the next and is not necessarily expressive. Most editing sequences juxtapose shots of varying space, time, and content combining to create an over- all idea, meaning, or tone. Montage in English terminology implies a rigorous and expressive editing style. There are two terms used by Bazin which either take on a different meaning in their English translation or don’t have an equivalent.

Note 5 in a 2003 essay/paper by Donato Totaro in Offscreen:Īndré Bazin: Part 1, Film Style Theory in its Historical Context But Découpage? Unusually, wiki does not provide an answer. Everyone who has read a little bit about film remembers montage as what Eisenstein did.